History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burstiner v. City of East Orange
103 N.J.L. 174
N.J.
1926
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 175

Case Details

Case Name: Burstiner v. City of East Orange
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 18, 1926
Citation: 103 N.J.L. 174
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.