History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burris v. Burris
278 Ark. 106
Ark.
1982
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of her motion for rule on the clerk to lodge the transcript. The record was refused by the clerk, and appellant’s motion for a rule denied by us, because Notice of Appeal was not timely filed. Appellant urges that we treat the failure as an unavoidable casualty, which we have done on occasion when the record was unavoidably tendered out of time. However, the rule of unavoidable casualty applies to the lodging of the record on appeal and not to the failure to file Notice of Appeal, the latter being jurisdictional. City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contracting Company, Inc., 260 Ark. 636, 543 S.W.2d 475 (1976) and Ward v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 228 Ark. 275, 307 S.W.2d 73 (1957).

Case Details

Case Name: Burris v. Burris
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Dec 20, 1982
Citation: 278 Ark. 106
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.