Burlington Distilling Co. v. State Board of Assessors

87 N.J.L. 315 | N.J. | 1915

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

*316For affirmance—The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Heppenheimer, JJ. 6.

midpage