History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burlingame v. Burlingame
18 Wis. 285
Wis.
1864
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Dixon, C. J.

Consensus tollit errorem. The parties consented that the jury might seal their verdict, deliver it to the clerk, and disperse to their homes and not return.

No exceptions were taken to the charge and no question can be made upon it.

The statute (Priv. Laws of 1861, ch. 302, sec. 6), requiring the board of supervisors of the town and the common council of the city to select and return the names of persons qualified to serve as jurors before the last day of May in each year, is directory. If properly selected and returned afterwards, it is no ground of challenge. See Mills v. Johnson, 17 Wis., 598.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Burlingame v. Burlingame
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 15, 1864
Citation: 18 Wis. 285
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.