Burks v. State, 600 So. 2d 387

ON RETURN TO REMAND

BOWEN, Judge.

On remand the trial court “retracted” portions of the prior proceedings, re-adjudged the appellant guilty based on the verdict of the jury, and specifically inquired and then permitted the appellant to make a statement before sentence was pronounced. The record now contains a proper allocution.

The trial court properly refused to allow the appellant to relitigate the facts of his trial at the sentencing hearing. This case was remanded with specific directions for a stated purpose. The trial court had no jurisdiction to take additional action not within the scope or contemplation of those directions. See Lynch v. State, 587 So.2d 306 (Ala.1991).

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Burks v. State

Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date Published: Dec 27, 1991

Citations: 600 So. 2d 387; 1991 WL 291723; 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2710; CR 89-887

Docket Number: CR 89-887

Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.