113 Ky. 111 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1902
Opinion of the court by
Affirming.
Burkhardt, being engaged in the wholesale oil business in Cincinnati, from which place he sent oil and gasoline into this State to be sold to retail dealers in Kenton county, brought suit against the 'oil inspector of Kenton county, his deputy, and a justice of the peace for an injunction to restrain the oil inspector and his deputy from bringing suit against him for fees as oil inspector for inspecting gasoline, and to prevent the justice from proceeding in such suits already brought. The ground averred for equitable intervention was that the inspector <and his deputy divided their accounts for inspection into small sums, so as to prevent appeals to the higher courts, and that the injunction prayed for should be granted in order to prevent a multiplicity of suits. A restraining order was granted until the further order of the court on August (5, 1897. On September 21st a motion to dissolve the restraining order was made by the defendant, and overruled in January, 1898. It is urged that the order, while denominated a “restraining order,” is, in form, an injunction; that it was granted without notice1, and did not fix a time and place within 10 days of the day upon which the order was made at which the applicant should move the court or judge to grant the injunction, as required by section 27(5 of the Civil Code Practice. We do not think it material to consider this question, as the case has been prepared upon the merits, and the .object of
Section 2202, Kentucky Statutes, provides “that all oils and fluids, the product of coal, petroleum or other bituminous substances, by whatever name1 called, which may or -can be used for illuminating purposes, manufactured in this State or brought into it before the same is consumed, used or sold to merchants or consumers within this State, shall be inspected by an authorized inspector of this State.” Section 2204 provides for the appointment of the inspector and his assistants, and section' 2205 provides the mode in which all oils shall be tested as follows: “(1) The water cup shall have sufficient watqr in it to rise two-thirds up the side of the oil cup. (2) Fill the oil cup with oil to be tested to within one-eightli of an inch of the top. (3) Suspend the thermometer so the bulb is just under the surface1 of the oil. (4) Use an alcohol lamp to heat the water bath, and before placing the light under the water cup, test the oil in the oil cup by bringing a lighted match in contract with the surface of the oil. If it does not. ignite, place the lamp under the water cup, and slowly heat the oil, not slower than one degree of the thermometer in a minute, nor faster than two degrees of the thermometer in a minute, moving a lighted match across the surface of the oil at each degree the thermometer rises, not more than three-eighths of an inch from the surface of the oil. If the oil should flash, that is a little gas burn on the surface and go out again, remove the1 lamp, and as soon as the thermometer ceases to rise; test the oil; and should it not ignite, replace the lamp, and test the oil each degree the thermometer rises till the oil ignites or permanently burns. As soon as the oil ignites or permanently burns, the degree indicated by the thermometer is
For appellant it is contended that, by virtue of the section last quoted (2190), it is not required that gasoline shall be inspected at all, except when sold for illuminating purposes; that it is not an illuminant, except in what is practically a gas machine; that appellant never sold gasoline for illuminating purposes, but, on the contrary, always kept a card upon the faucet of his tank wagon with the words, “Not sold for illuminating purposes.” It is further
The court, therefore, properly dismissed appellant’s petition, and the judgment is affirmed.
Petition for rehearing by appellant overruled.