History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burkhalter v. State
655 S.W.2d 208
Tenn. Crim. App.
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted murder and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for ten years. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in a published opinion delivered by the Court of *209Appeals, Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi [13th] 1982).

It now appears that the decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.Cr.App.R. 304(k); Art. 44.45(b)(6) and (7), V.A.C.C.P. See Hanna v. State, 632 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Burkhalter v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Date Published: Jun 29, 1983
Citation: 655 S.W.2d 208
Docket Number: No. 986-82
Court Abbreviation: Tenn. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.