History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burke v. Oregon
279 U.S. 811
SCOTUS
1929
Check Treatment
Per. Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, for the reason that the federal question presented is frivolous, on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toup v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Quong Ham Wah v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U. S. 445, 449.

Case Details

Case Name: Burke v. Oregon
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 5, 1929
Citation: 279 U.S. 811
Docket Number: No. 572
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.