History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burgess v. Sikes
403 F.3d 323
5th Cir.
2005
Check Treatment
Docket

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 6, 2004, 5 Cir., 2004, 392 F.3d 782)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *324The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case Details

Case Name: Burgess v. Sikes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 9, 2005
Citation: 403 F.3d 323
Docket Number: No. 04-30189
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.