History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burgess v. Sherman
147 Pa. 254
Pa.
1892
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

- — -We cannot sustain any of the specifications of error. It is very clear that no verdict could have been rendered against defendants Dundore, Delaplaine and Eckert, and this being an action on a contract the verdict must necessarily be against all the defendants or none.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Burgess v. Sherman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 25, 1892
Citation: 147 Pa. 254
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 1
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.