History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burgess v. Burgess
51 A. 1074
N.H.
1902
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The question in this case was decided in 1885, in Kimball v. Kimball, 63 N. H. 598, and the construction then put upon the statute in question ( Laws 1883, c. 14 ) was adopted by the legislature in 1891 by re-enactment without change. P. S., c. 175, s. 3; Parsons v. Durham, 70 N. H. 44, 45. Consent cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists. Whenever it appears that a court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, the proceeding is dismissed even if no objection is made. See Weeks v. Fowler, ante, p. 221.

Exception overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Burgess v. Burgess
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Apr 1, 1902
Citation: 51 A. 1074
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.