79 So. 193 | Ala. | 1918
A phase of this case was before the court in Burgess v. Burgess,
The statute is mandatory as to the manner of presenting claims against estates of decedents. The register's statement of the account with the administrator was pursuant to the former judgment here on decree of the chancellor. He was not authorized to allow claims against said estates not presented and proven as required by the statutes, as those statutes have been recently construed by this court. Code 1907, § 2589; Traweek v. Hagler,
The reason for the statutes of nonclaims was to prevent the payment of unjust, unconscionable, or fraudulent claims that may be made against estates by personal representatives and other creditors, without giving notice to the parties in interest and affording them the opportunity to resist the demands. Appellants submit that, if they are mistaken as to the decree of confirmation of the register's report's not being in accordance with the former opinion in Burgess v. Burgess, supra, this court should reconsider or modify the former decision. L. N. R. R. Co. v. W. U. Telegraph Co.,
Aside from the foregoing, the finding of the register had the effect of a jury's verdict. Bidwell v. Johnson,
The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.