Wе do not think the action lies. The decree must b.e construed as a decree entered in pursuance of the bill, which is a bill for the foreclоsure of a mortgage. It consists of two parts. The first orders the defendants named to pay the complainant one sixth of the sum due on the mortgаge notes, to wit, $1,216.67, with interest since June 30, 1880, on or before April 15, 1885. The second part orders, in default оf such payment, that the mortgaged premises bе sold, and a certain part of the proceeds paid into court. The second order does not come into operation if thе first is performed. If the first is not performed, the seсond becomes operative instead of it, and, when performed, the decree is executed. This results from the alternative character of the two parts. This character would bе at once apparent if, instead of thе words
(i.and
in default thereof ” at the beginning of the second part, the language had been “
or
in default thеreof.” But in our opinion the meaning is the same whichever phrase is used, because the two рarts are
*204
alternative. Indeed, the first part, thоugh mandatory in form, is an alternative in favor o£ thе defendants, giving them time to avoid foreclosure by paying the debt. Some of the defendants here are married women, incapable of binding themselves personalty for the debt, and the cоurt could not have intended to make an absоlute personal judgment against them. The casеs accord with this view. They hold, where the proceeds of sale under a decree of foreclosure by sale are deficient, that аn action lies for the deficiency on the mortgage note or bond.
Globe Insurance Co.
v. Lansing,
Plea of nul tiel record sustained. Judgment for defendants.