189 N.E.2d 744 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1962
The defendant, appellant herein, was convicted or pleaded guilty to traffic violations so that he had at least *60
twelve points against him within a period of two years from the date of the first conviction. Under provisions of Section
There is one assignment of error which is as follows:
"1. The defendant-appellant was unlawfully adjudged an habitual traffic violator and deprived of his driving privilege.
"(a) The defendant-appellant was not informed of the date, place and time for hearing on the application of the Registrar of Bureau of Motor Vehicles, requesting suspension of defendant-appellant's license or permit to operate a motor vehicle, as set forth in Section
"(b) The defendant-appellant, because he was not informed of the date, place and time for hearing, was not given an opportunity to be heard, contrary to Article
It appears that the procedure set out in the statute was complied with and is reasonable, and the order of the Common Pleas Court will be, and hereby is, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
DUFFEY, P. J., and BRYANT, J., concur. *61