168 N.E. 460 | Ind. | 1929
This was a prosecution by the State of Indiana against the appellant based upon an affidavit which charged him with the crime of vehicle taking. He entered a plea of not guilty and was tried by a jury which found him guilty as charged. The judgment was that he be committed to the Indiana State Prison for a period of not less than one year nor more than 10 years and that he be disfranchised and rendered incapable of holding any office of trust or profit for a period of four years, and that he pay the costs.
On appeal, it is assigned as error that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. The Attorney-General contends that the appellant has not presented any question to this court for consideration by that motion.
No ruling on the motion for a new trial or defendant's exception thereto appears in the record proper, but such a ruling and exception are shown in a special bill of exceptions. 1, 2. A motion for a new trial, the ruling of the court thereon, and the exception taken thereto are a part of the record without a bill of exceptions. Hill v. Newman
(1874),
It is evident from the authorities cited herein that there is no ruling on the motion for a new trial, and no exception to such ruling, upon which error can be predicated. In the absence 3. from the record proper of the ruling on the motion for a new trial and exception thereto, no question concerning the motion for a new trial is presented for consideration.
No error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.