History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burch v. . Bush
183 N.C. 676
N.C.
1922
Check Treatment

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury returned the following verdict:

"1. Was the administratrix of S. L. Burch really able and willing to finish cutting the timber according to contract? Answer: `Yes.'

"2. Was the administratrix of S. L. Burch kept from cutting the timber according to contract by any act of the defendants Bush Company? Answer: `Yes.'

"3. What damage, if any, did defendants Bush Company sustain by failure of administratrix of Burch to cut said timber (677) according to contract? Answer: `Nothing.'

"4. What sum was withheld by defendants Bush Company under 10 per cent clause of contract? Answer: `$445.' *Page 724

"5. In what sum, if anything, is estate of S. L. Burch indebted to defendants Bush Company by reason of overpayments on measurements? Answer: `Nothing.'"

From a judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed. Affirmed on authority of same case, Burch v. Bush, 181 N.C. 125.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Burch v. . Bush
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 29, 1922
Citation: 183 N.C. 676
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.