History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bunn v. Thomas
2 Johns. 189
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1807
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

As a term and more intervened between the teste and return of the writ, it is a mere nullity.* The writ being absolutely void, the cause is out of court, and we cannot grant leave to amend in such a cause.†, (a)

Rule granted.

3 Wil. 341. Parsons v. Lloyd. 2 Bl. Rep. 845.

2 Ld. Ray. 775. Shirley v. Wright.

[a] Though this is the law in respect to mesneprocess by arrest in personal actions, yet a writ of may be amended, where by mistake a term intervenes between the test and return. Jackson v. Crane, 1 Cow. 38.

Case Details

Case Name: Bunn v. Thomas
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1807
Citation: 2 Johns. 189
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.