History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bunn v. Hoyt
3 Johns. 255
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1808
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There has been no irregularity shown to render it proper to set aside the verdict; nor does the affidavit of newly discovered evidence disclose sufficient to support the application for a new trial. A verdict is never set aside to give the party an opportunity of impeaching the credit of witnesses sworn at a former trial. The evidence should be of some material fact, which would induce the belief, that if proved to the jury, it would so far influence their minds, as to produce a different verdict.

Rule refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Bunn v. Hoyt
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1808
Citation: 3 Johns. 255
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.