History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bungie Inc v. Fisher
2:23-cv-01143
W.D. Wash.
Jun 25, 2024
Check Treatment
Docket

BUNGIE INC., Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA FISHER, et al., Defendants.

Case No. C23-1143-MLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

June 25, 2024

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Bungie, Inc.‘s Ex Parte Motion for an Extension of the Service Deadline Under Rule 4(m). (Mot. (dkt. # 55).) This Court has previously granted Plaintiff‘s motions to expedite discovery (dkt. ## 27, 33, 50), and has also granted extensions to serve Defendants under Rule 4(m). (Dkt. ## 27, 30.) Plaintiff now states that it is still awaiting productions responsive to expedited discovery, identifying unknown Defendants, and serving Defendants with known contact information. (Mot. at 3.) Plaintiff also indicates that another motion for third-party discovery will likely be necessary for Plaintiff to finish identifying Defendants. (Id.) Accordingly, Plaintiff requests an additional 90 days to serve the remaining Defendants. (Id.)

Moreover, Plaintiff indicates that the responsive third-party discovery shows many of the remaining defendants “are domiciled abroad.” (Mot. at 4.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the requirement to serve a defendant within 90 days of filing a complaint does not apply to defendants located outside of the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that the Court—on motion or on its own after notice to plaintiff—must dismiss an action without prejudice against a defendant, or order that service be made within a specified time, if the defendant is not served within 90 days after the Complaint is filed. However, if plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the Court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2007) (“District courts have broad discretion to extend time for service under Rule 4(m).“).

The Court finds good cause to grant an extension to serve the remaining Defendants based on Plaintiff‘s continued investigation efforts, outstanding third-party discovery, and the likelihood that some remaining Defendants are located internationally. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff‘s Ex Parte Motion for an Extension of the Service Deadline Under Rule 4(m) (dkt. # 55) is GRANTED. The deadline for Plaintiff to serve Defendants is extended to September 25, 2024.

Dated this 25th day of June, 2024.

MICHELLE L. PETERSON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Bungie Inc v. Fisher
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Washington
Date Published: Jun 25, 2024
Citation: 2:23-cv-01143
Docket Number: 2:23-cv-01143
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In