midpage

Bungay v. MorinBungay v. Morin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1998
Versions:256 A.D.2d 462
683 N.Y.S.2d 859
1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered November 18, 1997, as directed him,to pay one-half of the legal fee of the Law Guardian for the children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances presented here, the Family Court’s *463apportionment of the Law Guardian’s fee was not improper (see, Petek v Petek, 239 AD2d 327; Cilento v Cilento, 225 AD2d 648; Hughes v Hughes, 224 AD2d 389). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bungay v. Morin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 16, 1998
Citations: 256 A.D.2d 462; 683 N.Y.S.2d 859; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In