History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bullock v. State
41 S.E. 609
Ga.
1902
Check Treatment
Little, J.

1. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial assign any specific error as having been committed by the trial judge in giving the charges complained of. They can not, therefore, be considered, except to ascertain whether they contain correct abstract propositions of law. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co., 107 Ga. 501 (4). So considered, no error appears.

2. The evidence supports the verdict, and the judgment overruling the motioh . for a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Bullock v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 24, 1902
Citation: 41 S.E. 609
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.