History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bullock v. Dunbar
17 Tex. 243
Tex.
1856
Check Treatment
Wheeler, J.

The plea of set-off was manifestly insufficient, in that it did not allege that the beneficial interest and ownership of the note sued on was not in the plaintiff, but in Ford, & Co., either at or after the time of the purchase by the defendants, of the note pleaded in set-off. The Court therefore did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea ; and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bullock v. Dunbar
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 17 Tex. 243
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.