Bullock v. Anthony Equities, Ltd.

Nov 30, 2004
Versions:12 A.D.3d 326
786 N.Y.S.2d 144
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14429

*327Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered March 9, 2004, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.

Defendants’ expert’s affidavit established that the subject door saddle was free of defect in design, installation or maintenance and had none of the characteristics of a snare or trap; that the hazard, if any, posed by the 3/4-inch height differential between the edge of the saddle and the kitchen floor was trivial; and that the New York City Building Code violations alleged by plaintiff were without merit. Plaintiffs expert’s affidavit failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to defendant’s negligence inasmuch as it was couched in general terms, referred to New York City Building Code sections that did not specifically address door saddles, and offered unsubstantiated conclusions regarding the alleged dangerous tripping hazard posed by the door saddle and regarding what constitutes good and accepted engineering practice in these circumstances (see Bean v Ruppert Towers Hous. Co., 274 AD2d 305, 308 [2000]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.