History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bull v. Carter
3:25-cv-00041
M.D. Tenn.
May 2, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ERIN BULL, et al., )

) Plaintiffs, ) NO. 3:25-cv-00041 v. )

) JUDGE CAMPBELL CLARENCE H. CARTER, ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY

)

Defendant. ) ORDER DISMISSING TAMIKA DAVIS AND BRANDI TAPIA AS PLAINITFFS

Plaintiffs Tamika Davis and Brandi Tapia through counsel seek the dismissal of Tamika Davis and Brandi Tapia as Plaintiffs in this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, “on motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party.” Good cause exists for dismissal. Tamika Davis and Brandi Tapia, through counsel, have indicated that they no longer wish to participate in the lawsuit as Plaintiffs.

Based on the above:

(1) Tamika Davis and Brandi Tapia are dismissed as Plaintiffs in this action along with

their claims for injunctive relief based on the facts asserted in the Complaint with prejudice;

(2) The remaining Plaintiffs shall continue to serve as Plaintiffs in this action and their

claims are unaffected by this Order; and (3) Nothing herein shall prohibit Ms. Davis or Ms. Tapia from filing a new action for any

actionable conduct that occurs after entry of this order.

It is so ORDERED .

___________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-00041 Document 74 Filed 05/02/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4415

Case Details

Case Name: Bull v. Carter
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Date Published: May 2, 2025
Docket Number: 3:25-cv-00041
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Tenn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.