History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bulger v. Hoffman
45 Ill. 352
Ill.
1867
Check Treatment
Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

There is no bill of exceptions appearing in this record, and, in its absence, we must presume the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with some proper rule or order of the court. It is impossible for this court, on what appears, to say why the appeal was dismissed. Appellant should have preserved the point by a bill of exceptions. The act of the legislature (§ 7, of Laws 1857), applies, in terms, to appeals from an inferior court, and authorizes their dismissal if an affidavit of merits be not filed before the expiration of the rule to plead, as in other cases.

We must presume such a rule was entered, which was not complied with.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bulger v. Hoffman
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1867
Citation: 45 Ill. 352
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.