Bulat v. Londrigan

65 N.J. Eq. 718 | N.J. | 1903

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11. For reversal — Hendrickson—1.