History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buie v. Blum
1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13337
N.Y. App. Div.
1980
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Because the facts are fully revealed and undisputed in light of Baker v Sterling (39 NY2d 397, 405-406) it would be useless for petitioner to make the application which respondents would require. (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court — art 78.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Buie v. Blum
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 30, 1980
Citation: 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13337
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.