midpage

Buenoano v. StateBuenoano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 9, 1987
No. 68074
Versions:
ADKINS, Justice (Ret.).

We granted review of Buenoano v. State, 478 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), on the basis of apparent conflict with such opinions as Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); and McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977), setting forth the standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence in criminal cases in which convictions are based upon circumstantial evidence. Upon closer examination of Buenoano, however, we have determined that the district court decision is fully in accord with this line of precedent. Finding no direct and express conflict with any Florida appellate opinion, we note that jurisdiction has been improvidently granted and dismiss the instant petition for review.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Buenoano v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 9, 1987
Citations: 504 So. 2d 762; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 177; 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1737; No. 68074
Docket Number: No. 68074
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In
    Buenoano v. State, 504 So. 2d 762