History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buckwalter v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE
955 A.2d 1014
| Pa. | 2008
|
Check Treatment
955 A.2d 1014 (2008)

Kendrick BUCKWALTER, Petitioner
v.
BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, Respondent.

No. 85 MAL 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 3, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether Baldwin v. City of Philadelphia, 99 Pa. 164, 1881 WL 13869 (1881), which held Pa. Const. art. III, § 13, now § 27, did not apply to a municipal ordinance that changed a public officer's compensation mid-term, should be reversed.
(2) Whether Pa. Const. art. III, § 27 prohibits mid-term compensation changes for elected municipal officers by means of a municipal ordinance.

Case Details

Case Name: Buckwalter v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 3, 2008
Citation: 955 A.2d 1014
Docket Number: 85 MAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.