History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buckman v. Buckman
4 N.H. 319
Superior Court of New Hampshir...
1828
Check Treatment
By the court.

The appeal is sustained. The order of the common pleas was a final determination of the action there, from which an appeal may be claimed. 5 Mass. Rep. 193, Tappan v. Bruen; 15 ditto, 178, Gilbreth v. Brown; 4 ditto, 107, Lamplear v. Lamprey; 2 ditto, 141, Bemis v. Faxon.

The course of the common pleas is different from the settled practice of this court in this class of cases. We cannot try the issue which has been joined in this case, but if the creditors will give security to pay all the costs which the plaintiff may recover, they will be permitted to defend in the name of the defendant. And in case the plaintiff shall prevail in the suit, he will have his remedy for his costs upon the security given. If the creditors prevail in the suit, they will be entitled to an execution in the name of the defendant for their costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Buckman v. Buckman
Court Name: Superior Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Apr 15, 1828
Citation: 4 N.H. 319
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.