History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buchanan v. State
30 S.E. 432
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
Little, J.

The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict rendered; the charges complained of were applicable to the testimony, and were not, for any reason alleged, erroneous; nor was there any error in “not charging” the various propositions which the motion for a new trial alleges should have been given to the jury. The record as a whole discloses no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Buchanan v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 22, 1898
Citation: 30 S.E. 432
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.