The defendant’s exception to the ruling of the court below is without merit. Hinson v. Britt, ante, 379; Hildebrand v. Tel. Co., 216 N.C. 235, 4 S.E. 2d 439; Hardy v. Dahl, 209 N.C. 746, 184 S.E. 480.
No new question is presented which requires elaboration. The judgment is
Affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
