History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buchan v. James
17 S.C. Eq. 375
S.C.
1843
Check Treatment
Curia, per Johnson, Ch.

The court agree that by the rule adopted by the court, in analogy to the statute of limitations, the demand of the complainant against the defendants, is barred, and on that ground, concur in the decree of the circuit court. The question as to the presumption of payment arising from the lapse of time, is not, therefore, necessary to the decision of the case, and the court have declined expressing any opinion as to its merits.

Appeal dismissed.

Harper, Dunkin and Johnston, Chancellors, concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Buchan v. James
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Dec 15, 1843
Citation: 17 S.C. Eq. 375
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.