History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bryson v. Phelps
125 So. 798
Ala.
1930
Check Treatment

As we gather from the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the point at which the nails were placed, while a part of the Montgomery and Birmingham Highway, was undergoing construction or repair, and, at the time, had not been turned over to the proper authorities and open to the public. *Page 390 This being the case, the question as to whether or not the road, at this point, was a public highway was a direct issue in the case, and testimony that it was at that time assumed that it had been surrendered to the proper authorities and opened to the public and which the opinion of the Court of Appeals states had not been done. This being the case, the Court of Appeals was justified in applying the rule laid down in the case of C. of G. Ry. Co. v. Faulkner, 217 Ala. 82, 114 So. 686, and in not following the case of McCullar v. Williams, 217 Ala. 278,116 So. 137.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bryson v. Phelps
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 16, 1930
Citation: 125 So. 798
Docket Number: 3 Div. 918.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.