History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bryant v. State
82 Ala. 51
Ala.
1886
Check Treatment
SOMERVILLE, J.

— The evidence shows that the defendant neither made the sale of the liquor, nor was he interested in it; nor was he interested in the money paid for it. He only aided the witness Angel to make the purchase, and he can not as accessory be more guilty than the principal for whom he acted. The fact of Angel being a minor aid not change the nature of the transaction. The law does not make the buying of spirituous liquors by a minor an offense; *53it is only the selling or giving of such liquors to a minor, without the consent of the parent, guardian, or other person having the lawful control of the minor, or without the requisition of a physician for medicinal purposes. The case falls directly within the principle decided in the following cases: Campbell v. State, 79 Ala. 271; Young v. The State, 58 Ala. 358; Morgan v. State, 81 Ala. 72.

The court erred in its several rulings. Its judgment is reversed, and a judgment will be rendered in this court discharging the defendant.

Bevérsed and rendered.

Case Details

Case Name: Bryant v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1886
Citation: 82 Ala. 51
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.