History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bryant v. State
26 Ga. App. 611
Ga. Ct. App.
1921
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

The accusation in this case charged that the accused “ did unlawfully have, control, possess, and have in possession alcohol, alcoholic liquors, spirituous liquors, mixed liquors, whisky, brandy, wine, rum and gin.” Upon the trial a confession of guilt was clearly shown. In this confession the defendant stated that he had brought certain whisky from Jones county on the morning of January 7th and left it at the home of his sister. The confession was corroborated by proof that on that date the officers found at the home of the defendant’s sister, on Hall street in East Macon, “three gallons of stump rum whisky.” “Proof of the corpus delicti may be sufficient corroboration of a confession of guilt to sustain a verdict of guilty.” Davis v. State, 105 Ga. 808 (3) (32 S. E. 158); Allen v. State, 8 Ga. App. 90 (68 S. E. 558). “While a conviction based upon an uncorroborated confession cannot be sustained, the sufficiency of the circumstances adduced for the purpose of corroboration is to be determined by the jury.” Cook v. State, 9 Ga. App. 208(3) (70 S.E. 1019).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bryant v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 13, 1921
Citation: 26 Ga. App. 611
Docket Number: 12093
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.