History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bryan v. Baird
117 Ga. 177
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Candleb, J.

This ;was an action for damages for malicious prosecution. The evidence for the plaintiff, taken most strongly in his favor, tended only to show that his name had been given to a member of the grand jury by one of the defendants, along with others comprising a list of physicians alleged to be practicing medicine illegally. There was no evidence that the plaintiff was ever indicted, or that any prosecution was ever set in motion against him by any of the defendants. The grant of a nonsuit was, therefore, not error. Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Case Details

Case Name: Bryan v. Baird
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 10, 1903
Citation: 117 Ga. 177
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.