History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brush v. Taggart
7 Johns. 19
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1810
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decision below was correct. The ' contents of the writ of certiorari could not be proved by parol, so long as the writ itself, or a sworn copy of it, might have been produced. The case of Edmonstone v. Plaisted (4 Esp. Rep. 160.) shows the strict manner in which the contents of á process, or the existence of it, is to be proved,

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brush v. Taggart
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1810
Citation: 7 Johns. 19
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.