Brush v. Taggart

7 Johns. 19 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1810

Per Curiam.

The decision below was correct. The ' contents of the writ of certiorari could not be proved by parol, so long as the writ itself, or a sworn copy of it, might have been produced. The case of Edmonstone v. Plaisted (4 Esp. Rep. 160.) shows the strict manner in which the contents of á process, or the existence of it, is to be proved,

Judgment affirmed.