298 F. Supp. 380 | W.D. Okla. | 1969
ORDER REMANDING CASE
The Plaintiff sues the Defendants in state court for damages resulting from a motor vehicle collision. The Defendants by state permitted procedure filed a
The Court finds and concludes that the Motion to Remand should be sustained and the entire case should be remanded to state court. The third party action is not a separate and independent claim or cause of action under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c). Being of the nature of indemnity should the original Defendants be found responsible for the collision, the third party action is dependent upon the original action and is not separate and independent therefrom. Moreover, if the third party action should be deemed separate and independent from the original action, the same was not joined by the Plaintiff in his original Petition which is a further requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c). Holloway v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 274 F.Supp. 321 (ND Ill.1967); Cannon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 241 F.Supp. 23 (ED S.Car.1965); Harper, et al. v. Sonnabend v. Hadley, 182 F.Supp. 594 (SD N.Y.1960); Burlingham, Underwood, Barron, etc. v. Luckenback S. S. Co., 208 F.Supp. 544 (SD N.Y.1962); White v. Baltic Conveyor Company, 209 F.Supp. 716 (D N.J.1962); Shaver v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 171 F.Supp. 754, (WD Ark.1959); Rager v. Crampes v. Williams, 223 F.Supp. 346 (WD Ky.1963).
It is, therefore, ordered that the entire controversy herein is hereby remanded to the state court from which removed. The Clerk of this Court will take the necessary action to remand the case.
. 28 U.S.C. | 1441(c), reads as follows:
“§ 1441. Actions removable generally (c) Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action, which would be removable if sued upon alone, is joined with one or more otherwise non-remov.able claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction.”