History
  • No items yet
midpage
Browning v. Hoover
95 S.C. 32
S.C.
1913
Check Treatment

May 29, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by In this action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, the defendant relied on the allegation that the plaintiff had only a life estate and, therefore, could not make a good title. This contention rests on the fact that the conveyance from Belle M. Goethe, under which the plaintiff claimed was "to F.W. Browning for and during the term of his natural life and at his death to his heirs living at that time, in fee, and not to be subject to the debts, contracts and liabilities of the said F.W. Browning."

There can be no doubt of the correctness of the Circuit Court, holding that F.W. Browning took a fee simple.Davenport v. Eskew, 69 S.C. 292; Clinkscales v. Clinkscales,91 S.C. 59; Egan v. Touchberry, 93 S.C. 569.

Affirmed. *Page 33

Case Details

Case Name: Browning v. Hoover
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: May 29, 1913
Citation: 95 S.C. 32
Docket Number: 8564
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.