95 Mich. 441 | Mich. | 1893
Complainant and defendant own adjoining premises. This controversy arises over a small stream which complainant claims was wrongfully diverted from her premises. Defendant makes a similar complaint against the complainant, each asking that the other be restrained.
The questions in this case are:. Did the stream originally flow upon complainant’s land? If not, then has she obtained a right by adverse possession? Both are questions of fact, and both appear to have been carefully
As only questions of fact are involved,' it is unnecessary to discuss the case further.
The decree of the circuit court, dismissing the bill, will be affirmed, with costs.