Case Information
*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * Case No. 2:18-cv-01504-RFB-VCF ROBERT BROWNE, Plaintiff, ORDER v. DOLGEN MIDWEST, LLC, Defendant.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered May 7, 2019. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by May 21, 2019. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
*2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence (ECF No. 12) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHERORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted (ECF No. 16) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Countermotion to Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted for Relief Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(b) (ECF No. 20) is
GRANTED.
DATED: June 3, 2019.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
- 2 -