History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Wilson
95-7840
4th Cir.
Apr 10, 1996
Check Treatment

*1 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith P. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor- ney General, Evelyn Omega Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Wilson, No. CA-95-588-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Wilson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 10, 1996
Docket Number: 95-7840
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.