History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.
101 N.J. Super. 299
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
101 N.J. Super. 299 (1968)
244 A.2d 310

EVELYN G. BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JACK E. MEREDITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 27, 1968.
Decided June 11, 1968.

*300 Mr. Howard H. Kestin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hoffmann & Humphreys, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

We are in full agreement with the trial court's ruling, reported at 96 N.J. Super. 91 (Law Div. 1967), that the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., does not apply to an accident occurring outside the State of New Jersey, even though the vehicle, the operation of which allegedly caused the accident, was an uninsured automobile registered in this State.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jun 11, 1968
Citation: 101 N.J. Super. 299
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.