History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Unknown Parties
2:16-cv-03501
D. Ariz.
Jun 5, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) No. CV-16-03501-PHX-SPL Ron Damon Brown, ) Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER vs. Unknown Parties, et al., Respondents. )

Petitioner Ron Damon Brown has filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5). The Honorable Bridget S. Bade, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court deny the Petition. Judge Bade advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 22) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well- *2 taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge Bade’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is

accepted and adopted by the Court; 2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5) is denied and dismissed with prejudice ; 3. That a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied ; and 4. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Dated this 5th day of June, 2017. Honorable Steven P. Logan United States District Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Unknown Parties
Court Name: District Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Jun 5, 2017
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-03501
Court Abbreviation: D. Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.