540 So. 2d 924 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1989
We reject each of the arguments raised by the defendant in this appeal from his conviction after a jury trial of possession of cocaine and resisting an officer with violence.
The appellant’s claim that the lower court should have conducted a hearing on his plainly insufficient motion to discharge court-appointed counsel is similarly without merit. See Smelley v. State, 486 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The remaining point is frivolous.
Affirmed.