History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. State
436 So. 2d 243
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but agree that the sentence, which was predicated upon classification of the appellant as a youthful offender, was excessive. The state concedes this sentencing error on appeal. Specifically, the youthful offender scheme provides for a maximum commitment of six (6) years, section 958.05(2), Florida Statutes (1979), and that the term have no more than a one year minimum mandatory provision, section 958.05(3). The sentence imposed herein exceeds these limits.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for a new sentence in accord with this opinion.

ANSTEAD, C.J., BERANEK, J., and CO-CALIS, PATRICIA W., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 6, 1983
Citation: 436 So. 2d 243
Docket Number: No. 82-952
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.