History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. State
48 S.E. 152
Ga.
1904
Check Treatment
Candler, J.

The motion for a new trial complains only that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. There was positive testimony that the crime charged in the indictment was committed by the accused, and this testimony was contradicted only by his statement. It was therefore not error to refuse to set aside the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 12, 1904
Citation: 48 S.E. 152
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.