History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. State
71 Tex. Crim. 212
Tex. Crim. App.
1913
Check Treatment

In this case the appellants were prosecuted and convicted for theft and their punishment assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary. The jury, however, in their verdict, under proper instructions from the court, find "that the defendants have never heretofore been convicted of a felony in this State or in any other State, and recommend a suspension of sentence by the court."

The court, however, ignored this portion of the verdict of the jury, and sentenced them to the penitentiary. Recently in the case of Baker v. State, 70 Tex.Crim. Rep., we had this question before us and held the court had no authority to pass sentence upon such a verdict, under the law of this State. The sentence is a nullity because in violation of the statute, and this cause is remanded with instructions to release the prisoners upon recognizance as is provided by chapter 7 of the Acts of the Thirty-third Legislature.

Remanded with instructions.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 27, 1913
Citation: 71 Tex. Crim. 212
Docket Number: No. 2638.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.