History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. State
46 Tex. Crim. 572
Tex. Crim. App.
1904
Check Treatment

Conviction of cattle theft; four years in the penitentiary fixed as a penalty. The indictment is attacked because it begins, "In the name and the authority of the State of Texas," the word "by" being omitted and "the" inserted, whereas the constitutional requirement is that it shall begin "In the name and by the authority of the State of Texas." This objection is well taken. The question has been so often decided we deem it unnecessary to enter *Page 573 into a further discussion of it. Saine v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 144; Jefferson v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 535; Owens v. State, 25 Texas Crim. App., 552; Thompson v. State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 39; Thompson v. State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 168; Scroggins v. State, 36 Tex.Crim. Rep.; White's Ann. C.C.P., secs, 336, 345. We deem the other questions raised without merit. The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 24, 1904
Citation: 46 Tex. Crim. 572
Docket Number: No. 2834.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.